http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/08/report-joran-van-der-sloot-to-become-a-father-behind-bars/?hpt=us_t2
Van der Sloot known for the murder of Stephany Flores in Peru, and for being arrested twice but never charged after the 2005 disappearance of the U.S. teen Natalee Holloway in Aruba is soon to be a father. Serving 28 years for Flores death, he meant a women by the name Leidi. Van der Sloot admitted killing Stephany Flores in his hotel room in Peru in 2010. If Van der Sloot is found for the murder of Natalee Holloway he could serve another 25 years. I believe he shouldn't be able to have the privilege of visitors or even meeting with people in his own jail. The kid will have to suffer consequences of his father. I hope that the baby is taken away from both the mother and father, where there is love and no evil.I still don't understand why the prison system allows conjugal visits, especially for a murderer. Conjugal visits should be a privilege to people who actually deserve it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that it is insane that the visits Jordan Van Der Sloot received were unsupervised because visits with a prisoner can become very dangerous. Encounters with an imprisoned assassin and anyone should be monitored by police for everyone’s safety. It is trifling that the law enforcement was so oblivious that Leidi was impregnated during a scheduled visit with a dangerous and possibly unstable killer. The prisons now appear to be deficient with inferior officials which impact the government’s power and superiority over all the citizens. I also agree that a confessed murderer should under no circumstances have been permitted visits, let alone private ones. It is wrong for a child to be brought up by a woman in love with an intimidating criminal. The child should not be raised by either or both of its parents because they are such outrageous people he/she can look up to. Rearing a child under these circumstances may affect or even impair their future from the lack of proper nurturing. Would it be right for Child Services to seize this child from its mother to give it a shot at a normal life or let the mother raise this child however she chooses? Either resolve would clearly impact the child but it would impact all of the citizens as well. By letting the mother raise the child, the authority shows acceptance and forgiveness to the people. But if Child Services acquires this child it shows that the government is more concerned about the wellbeing of the people and less concerned about oppressing their rights.
ReplyDelete