Initially, I expected this to be an article that cleared the
air about the horrible attack on the US Embassy in Benghazi, however, I was
disappointed to find that it left me with more questions. The article mentions
how some believe the attack to be related to the Anti-Islamic video that was
released soon before this event occurs, however, it is unlikely that this is
truly the case. A video, while it may anger people, seldom has the ability to
empower people to kill others. It is simply unrealistic, yet I am certain that
it will still be a reason that will be heavily debated when this event is (if
it is) discussed again. Personally, I feel that it was simply a horrible act of terror, completely unrelated to the video. Although these emails give us readers a clearer idea as
to how long the time span is in which events like this take place, they do not
provide us with any clearer idea of what actually occurred and who was truly to
blame in this case. This relates to class in a way that could certainly help
all of us write essays in the future; even with an important piece of evidence
being used to help prove a point, if it is not completely specific, it may
leave your audience with even more questions than before they read anything. Does anyone feel differently? What do you think about potential reasons for the attack?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.